Most comparison pages in this category are published by one of the tools being compared. This one isn't neutral either — we earn a commission on one of them, and we've marked exactly which. What we have tried to do instead is make every factual cell verifiable, including the rows where the tool we are affiliated with loses.
Last verified: 14 August 2026. Pricing in this category changes often — check the vendor page before you buy.
Scroll sideways on mobile. Rork's column is highlighted only so you can find it — not because it wins.
| Criterion | Rork | Lovable | Bolt.new | Replit | v0 (Vercel) | FlutterFlow | Cursor | Hand-coded Expo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry paid priceCheapest useful tier | $25/mo | $25/mo | $25/mo | $25/mo | $20/mo | $39/mo | $20/mo | $0 tooling |
| Free tier usable?Can you evaluate without paying | LimitedPublic projects only, no export | Limited5 daily credits | Limited1M tokens/mo | LimitedDaily agent credits | Limited$5 credits/mo | YesNo code export | Limited | Yes |
| Pricing modelHow you get metered | AI messages | Credits | Tokens | Credits ($) | Credits ($) | Seats + AI requests | Requests | None |
| Unused allowance rolls over? | No | DisputedSources conflict — verify | No | No | No | n/a | No | n/a |
| Ships a real native mobile appInstallable binary, not a web page | YesReact Native; Swift on Max | NoReact web app only | YesVia Expo integration | PartialWeb-first | NoNext.js web UI | YesFlutter native | YesIf you write it | Yes |
| iOS + Android + web from one codebase | Yes | Web only | Yes | Partial | Web only | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-first or visual?How you actually drive it | Prompt (chat) | Prompt (chat) | Prompt (chat) | Prompt (agent) | Prompt (chat) | Visual builder + AI | Prompt inside an IDE | You write code |
| Code exportCan you take the code and leave | YesGitHub, paid tiers | YesGitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | YesFull Dart source, $39 tier | YesIt is your repo | Yes |
| App Store publishing pathHow hard to actually ship | Built in | NoneNothing to submit | ManualEAS CLI commands | Manual | None | One-click | Manual | Manual |
| Keeps working if you stop payingAccess to your own projects | NoProjects lock; export first | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | YesLocal repo | Yes |
| Needs coding abilityTo get to a shipped app | No | No | SomeCLI for mobile builds | Some | Some | SomeVisual, but a real learning curve | Yes | Yes |
| Public review sentimentIndependent review sites, small samples | Mixed2.1/5 Trustpilot (13) · 4.4/5 PH (25) | Generally positive | Generally positive | Generally positive | Generally positive | Generally positive | Strongly positive | n/a |
On that last row. Review-site samples in this category are tiny and self-selecting — people who had a billing problem write reviews, people who quietly shipped an app usually don't. Rork's Trustpilot score is genuinely low, and the complaints cluster consistently around credit consumption and subscription lockout. Its Product Hunt score is genuinely good. Both are true and neither is a verdict. Treat it as a reason to test on the free tier before committing, not as a reason to dismiss the tool.
The table tells you what they do. This tells you who should pick which.
The most direct path from "I have an app idea and can't code" to something installable on a phone. Mobile is the default, not a bolt-on, and the App Store path is built in rather than handed to you as CLI commands.
Best for: non-developers who specifically want a mobile app and want the publishing step handled.Excellent at what it does, which is React web apps — landing pages, dashboards, SaaS front ends. It does not produce mobile apps, and there is no wrapper trick that changes that.
Best for: web apps and SaaS, not mobile.Genuinely does native mobile now via its Expo integration, which makes it Rork's closest functional competitor. The trade-off is that shipping involves EAS CLI commands and an Expo account — fine if you're semi-technical, a wall if you're not.
Best for: semi-technical builders who want web and mobile from one tool.A full development environment with an agent attached, plus hosting. Strongest when you want the whole stack in one place. Mobile is possible but is not what it's built around.
Best for: full-stack web projects that need hosting too.The best UI output in the category, tightly bound to React, Next.js and the Vercel ecosystem. No mobile story at all.
Best for: frontend and UI work by people who already ship on Vercel.The most capable native mobile option here, and the only one with genuinely one-click store deployment plus full source export. It's a visual builder, not a chat prompt, so there's a real learning curve — days, not minutes.
Best for: people willing to learn a tool properly in exchange for more control.An AI-assisted code editor, not an app builder. Enormously effective — if you can already read and write code. Included here because it keeps appearing on lists it doesn't belong on.
Best for: developers. Not for non-coders.The baseline everything else is competing with. Zero licence cost, total control, and a months-long learning curve if you're starting from nothing.
Best for: anyone who plans to keep building apps for years.Included because a comparison chart that never contradicts the affiliate link is worthless — to you and, eventually, to me.
The embed auto-updates when this chart is revised, so it will not go stale on your page. It posts its height to the parent window if you want to auto-size the iframe.
Two tools at a time, on 15 criteria, with the one difference that decides it.
Bolt.new vs Lovable · Bolt.new vs FlutterFlow · Lovable vs FlutterFlow · Lovable vs v0 by Vercel · Bolt.new vs Replit · Lovable vs Replit · FlutterFlow vs Hand-coded Expo · Cursor vs Bolt.new · v0 by Vercel vs FlutterFlow · Rork vs Lovable · Rork vs Bolt.new · Rork vs FlutterFlow
Every price and capability claim above traces to one of these, checked on 14 August 2026.